Davis v. Jackson et al
Plaintiff: Tiquan Davis
Defendant: Angela Jackson, John Doe, Donahue, George John Doe, Ginah Shibah, Jane Doe O'cana and Raymond L. Ortiz
Case Number: 7:2015cv05359
Filed: July 7, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: White Plains Office
County: Westchester
Presiding Judge: Kenneth M. Karas
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 104 OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending Motion, (Dkt. No. 94), enter judgment for Defendants, close this case, and mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 2/8/2019) (jca) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
January 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 86 OPINION & ORDER re: 77 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by Gina Shibah, T. Grant, V. George, Raymond Ortiz, Lt. O'Cana, Richard Donahue, Angela Jackson, Todd Paroline. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants Moti on is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's retaliation and due process claims against Jackson, Ortiz, Shi bah, Donahue, George, and O'Cana are dismissed with prejudice as time-barred and collaterally estopped. Plaintiff's retaliation claim against Grant is also dismissed, but, because this is the first adjudication of Plaintiff's claim against Grant on the merits, that claim is dismissed without prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes to file an Amended Complaint alleging additional facts and otherwise addressing the deficiencies identified above, Plaintiff must do so within 30 days of the date of this Opinion & Order. Plaintiff is advised that a second amended complaint would replace, and not supplement, the prior c omplaint. Accordingly, Plaintiff should include all allegations he wants to include against the Defendants remaining in this case. Defendants' Motion is denied as to the retaliation claims against Paroline. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending Motion, (Dkt. No. 77), and to mail a copy of this Opinion & Order to Plaintiff's address listed on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 1/8/2018) (mml)
September 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 52 OPINION & ORDER re: 22 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment, filed by Raymond L. Ortiz, Ginah Shibah, Angela Jackson. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this Opinion. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending Motion. (See Dkt. No. 22.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 9/30/16) (yv)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Jackson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiquan Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Angela Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donahue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: George John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ginah Shibah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe O'cana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raymond L. Ortiz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?