Bass v. Colvin

Bass v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Tammy L. Bass
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	1:2016cv06721
Filed:	August 25, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	White Plains Office
County:	Bronx
Presiding Judge:	Vincent L. Briccetti
Presiding Judge:	Judith C. McCarthy
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 18, 2022	Filing 27 OPINION & ORDER re: 22 MOTION for Attorney Fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) filed by Tammy L. Bass. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion is granted. The Binder Firm is entitled to $12,644.25 in attorney& #039;s fees under § 406(b). Upon receipt of such fees, the Binder Firm is directed to return the $3,088.54 in EAJA fees currently in its possession to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy on 5/18/2022) (vfr)
October 5, 2017	Filing 19 OPINION AND ORDER re: 9 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Tammy L. Bass, 17 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Carolyn W. Colvin. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted and the Commissioner's cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. The case is remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings consistent with this decision. The Clerk is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motions (Docket Nos. 9, 17) and close the case. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy on 10/5/2017) (mml)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 18, 2022

Filing 27 OPINION & ORDER re: 22 MOTION for Attorney Fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) filed by Tammy L. Bass. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion is granted. The Binder Firm is entitled to $12,644.25 in attorney& #039;s fees under § 406(b). Upon receipt of such fees, the Binder Firm is directed to return the $3,088.54 in EAJA fees currently in its possession to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy on 5/18/2022) (vfr)

October 5, 2017

Filing 19 OPINION AND ORDER re: 9 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Tammy L. Bass, 17 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Carolyn W. Colvin. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted and the Commissioner's cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. The case is remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings consistent with this decision. The Clerk is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motions (Docket Nos. 9, 17) and close the case. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy on 10/5/2017) (mml)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bass v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tammy L. Bass
Represented By:	Charles E Binder
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?