Voss v. Shulkin
| Anthony Voss |
| David J. Shulkin |
| 7:2017cv09015 |
| November 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Kenneth M. Karas |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 94 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by David J. Shulkin. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants motion for summary judgment on liability is GRANTED and Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on liability is DENIED. The Complaint is, therefore, dismissed in its entirety. This action is not, however, terminated, because Defendant's counterclaims have not been resolved. Accordingly, the Court shall hold a status conference by telepho ne at 9:30 a.m. on December 1, 2021. At the time of that conference, the parties shall call: (888) 398-2342; access code: 3456831. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion sequence pending at Doc. 94 and to amend the caption replacing the current DefendantDavid J. Shulkinwith the current Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs, Denis McDonough. SO ORDERED. (Telephone Conference set for 12/1/2021 at 09:30 AM before Judge Philip M. Halpern.), Den is McDonough and Denis McDonough added. David J. Shulkin (M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Department of Veterans Affairs) and David J. Shulkin (M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Department of Veterans Affairs) terminated. (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 9/15/2021) (jca)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER granting 100 Letter Motion to Seal. Application granted. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to strike Doc. 98-38 from the docket but retain the summary docket text for the record. Plaintiff is directed to re-file a properly redacted version of the document by 5:00 p.m. on February 26, 2021. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion sequence pending at Doc. 100. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 2/24/2021) (ks)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER granting 92 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Application granted. Plaintiff's opposition to the motion shall be served on or before February 1, 2021. Defendant's reply papers, if any, shall be served on or before Febr uary 16, 2021. All motion papers shall be filed on the new reply date, February 16, 2021. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion sequence pending at Doc. 92. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 2/1/2021) (ks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Voss v. Shulkin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anthony Voss | |
| Represented By: | Steven Felsenfeld |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: David J. Shulkin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
