United States of America, ex rel. Intergra Med Analytics, LLC. v. Issac Laufer et al.
| 7:2017cv09424 |
| January 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Other Statutes: False Claims Act |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
206
ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: This action is stayed through January 26, 2025, and all pending deadlines are extended for a period of six months. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy on 7/29/2024) (vfr)
|
|
Filing
204
ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: This action is stayed through July 26, 2024, and all pending deadlines are extended for a period of six months. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy on 1/30/2024) (mml)
|
|
Filing
202
ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: This action is stayed through January 26, 2024, and all pending deadlines are extended for a period of six months, and The Status Conference scheduled for July 27, 2023 is canceled. The parties are directed to file a joint letter by January 31, 2024, notifying the Court of the status of this matter. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy on 7/26/2023) (vfr)
|
|
Filing
195
ORDER: For the above-stated reasons, Defendant's objections are overruled and Magistrate Judge McCarthy's May 3, 2023 decision on the motion to compel responses to interrogatories is AFFIRMED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/27/2023) (ama)
|
|
Filing
178
ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to compel the Government to reveal the identities of the Interviewees is denied. However, the Government is directed to provide Defendants with a list of individuals on whom it intends to rely upon at trial, as well as the names of the individuals referenced in the Complaint. Furthermore, Defendants' request for summaries of the Government's interviews is denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy on 5/2/2023) (vfr)
|
|
Filing
159
PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material... SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy on 2/23/2023) (vfr)
|
|
Filing
156
ORDER: In order to facilitate the progress of pre-trial discovery of this litigation in a just, speedy and inexpensive manner, to ensure compliance with the case management plan, and to prevent the accumulation of unresolved discovery issue s, the following procedures will be followed for the resolution of discovery disputes: The party objecting to disclosure, claiming an insufficient response to a discovery request or asserting a privilege bears the burden of coming forward by bri nging the dispute to the attention of the Court as hereinafter set forth. The attention of counsel and the parties is respectfully directed to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(d) regarding the conduct of depositions. If a privilege objection is raised at a deposition, counsel are directed to contact chambers by telephone during the deposition for a ruling. ( As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy on 1/25/2023) (vfr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America, ex rel. Intergra Med Analytics, LLC. v. Issac Laufer et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
