DeAngelo v. Maximus et al
| Deborah DeAngelo |
| Sullivan County Dept of Social Services and Maximus |
| 1:2019cv07957 |
| August 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
LETTER from D. DeAngelo dated 10/3/19 re: Plaintiff urgently requests that the Court seal or restrict her records from public view, because she has become aware that her filings are on the internet; that third-party PACER Monitor has now been posted on the internet as an advertisement; and she is concerned for her safety and reputation. Document filed by Deborah DeAngelo.(sc)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 9/25/2019) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Mailed a copy of #3 Order Granting IFP Application to Deborah DeAngelo 150 Martinfeld Road P.O. Box 65 Greenfield Park, NY 12435. (vba)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against Maximus, Sullivan County Dept of Social Services. Document filed by Deborah DeAngelo. (sac)
|
|
Filing 1
REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Deborah DeAngelo.(sac)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (sac)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
