Miller v. Esper et al
| Marytherese Miller |
| Inspector Generals Dodig & Army, LTG Charles Pede, Natasha L. Waglow, Mark T. Esper, Jeff T.H. Pon, Ryan D. McArthy, Dennis Dean Kirk, Kevin J. Berry and Jamie Nawaday |
| 7:2020cv01958 |
| March 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Kenneth M Karas |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (sac)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Kevin J. Berry, Mark T. Esper, Inspector Generals Dodig & Army, Dennis Dean Kirk, Ryan D. McArthy, Jamie Nawaday, Charles Pede, Jeff T.H. Pon, Natasha L. Waglow. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 465407017892)Document filed by Marytherese Miller. (sac)
|
|
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Kevin J. Berry, Mark T. Esper, Inspector Generals Dodig & Army, Dennis Dean Kirk, Ryan D. McArthy, Jamie Nawaday, Charles Pede, Jeff T.H. Pon, Natasha L. Waglow. (sac)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (sac)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sac)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
