D.R. et al v. Santos Bakery, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: D.R. and Towana Rodriguez
Defendant: Santos Bakery, Inc. and Wilson Villa-Tenemaza
Case Number: 7:2020cv03628
Filed: May 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2020 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney Kathleen Marie Mulholland. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (pne)
May 11, 2020 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Kathleen Marie Mulholland to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Notice of Removal,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the pleading is not correct; the pleading filed as Exhibit 1 must be the main document; the Notice can be filed as an Exhibit or as a Notice using the event type Notice (Other) found under Other Filings > Notices. Re-file the pleading using the event type Notice of Removal found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. If the deficiency/deficiencies are not corrected within five (5) days per Amended Standing Order 15-mc-00131 this case will be administratively closed. Initial Pleading due by 5/18/2020. **DO NOT USE GOOGLE CHROME OR SAFARI BROWSERS** (pne)
May 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR -NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of Bronx. Case Number: 22586/2020. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-19771637).Document filed by SANTOS BAKERY, WILSON VILLA-TENEMAZA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Petition for Removal, #2 Exhibit A- Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit B- Answer, #4 Affidavit Aff of Service).(Mulholland, Kathleen) Modified on 5/11/2020 (pne).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: D.R. et al v. Santos Bakery, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Santos Bakery, Inc.
Represented By: Kathleen Marie Mulholland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wilson Villa-Tenemaza
Represented By: Kathleen Marie Mulholland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: D.R.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Towana Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?