Morales v. Fross, Zelnick, Lehrman & Zissu, P.C. et al
| Gayle Morales |
| Terry Raphael, James D Weinberger, Fross, Zelnick, Lehrman & Zissu, P.C. and Leo Kittay |
| 7:2021cv04509 |
| May 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Philip M Halpern |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: granting #7 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Application granted. Defendants shall answer or move by August 19, 2021. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion sequence pending at Doc 7. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 7/13/2021) (ama)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Fross, Zelnick, Lehrman & Zissu, P.C. answer due 8/19/2021; Leo Kittay answer due 8/19/2021; Terry Raphael answer due 8/19/2021; James D Weinberger answer due 8/19/2021. (ama) |
| Filing 7 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to file Answer addressed to Judge Philip M. Halpern from Marc D. Braverman dated 7/12/2021. Document filed by Fross, Zelnick, Lehrman & Zissu, P.C., Leo Kittay, Terry Raphael, James D Weinberger..(Braverman, Marc) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. James D Weinberger waiver sent on 5/21/2021, answer due 7/20/2021. Document filed by Gayle Morales..(Brice, Trevor) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Terry Raphael waiver sent on 5/21/2021, answer due 7/20/2021. Document filed by Gayle Morales..(Brice, Trevor) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Leo Kittay waiver sent on 5/21/2021, answer due 7/20/2021. Document filed by Gayle Morales..(Brice, Trevor) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Fross, Zelnick, Lehrman & Zissu, P.C. waiver sent on 5/21/2021, answer due 7/20/2021. Document filed by Gayle Morales..(Brice, Trevor) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Trevor Brice. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand 10,000,000. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to 9,999,999. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Philip M. Halpern. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Brice, Trevor) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fross, Zelnick, Lehrman & Zissu, P.C., Leo Kittay, Terry Raphael, James D Weinberger. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24562720)Document filed by Gayle Morales..(Brice, Trevor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
