Sikorsky v. City of Newburgh, New York et al
| Kenneth Michael Sikorsky |
| City of Newburgh, New York, City of Newburgh, NY Corporate Counsel, Jeremy Kaufman and Orange County, New York, Real Property |
| 7:2022cv02387 |
| March 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Valerie E Caproni |
| Philip M Halpern |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Philip M. Halpern. Judge Valerie E. Caproni is no longer assigned to the case. (aea) |
| Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy is so redesignated. (aea) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Newburgh, NY Corporate Counsel, City of Newburgh, New York, Jeremy Kaufman, Orange County, New York, Real Property. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number 465401295889)Document filed by Kenneth Michael Sikorsky..(rdz) |
| Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
