Schulz v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc.
| Steven V Schulz |
| Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. and 15 Cobblestone Lane LLC |
| Firstloans, Inc. |
| 7:2025cv01256 |
| February 12, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 fc Diversity - Foreclosure |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Klein, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to 15 COBBLESTONE LANE LLC, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC, FIRSTLOANS, INC, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Steven V Schulz..(Klein, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Steven V Schulz, Firstloans, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-30608596)Document filed by Steven V Schulz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh A description of property, #2 Exhibit Exh B Agreement betw plalintiff and Brennan, #3 Exhibit Exh C Recorded mortgage).(Klein, Jeffrey) |
| ADD PARTY FOR PLEADING. Defendants/Respondents Firstloans, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc., 15 Cobblestone Lane LLC added. Party added pursuant to #1 Complaint,.Document filed by Steven V Schulz. Related document: #1 Complaint,..(Klein, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
