Shue v. Emma's Restaurant Group LLC et al
| Jiang Hai Shue |
| Pei Fwu Chen, Emma's Restaurant Group LLC doing business as Mister Chen, Homura Enterprise Inc. doing business as Mister Chen Express, MPM Restaurant Group Inc. doing business as Mister Chen Express, Paul Chen, Peitao Chen, Peifwu Chen and Ada Liu |
| 7:2025cv03290 |
| April 21, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7434 IRS: Civil Damages for Fraudulent Filing of Information |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Troy, John) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to EMMAS RESTAURANT GROUP LLC d/b/a Mister Chen, HOMURA ENTERPRISE INC. d/b/a Mister Chen Express, MPM RESTAURANT GROUP INC. d/b/a Mister Chen Express, PEI FWU CHEN a/k/a Paul Chen a/k/a Peitao Chen a/k/a Peifwu Chen, and ADA LIU, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Jiang Hai Shue..(Troy, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pei Fwu Chen, Emma's Restaurant Group LLC, Homura Enterprise Inc., Ada Liu, MPM Restaurant Group Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-30960149)Document filed by Jiang Hai Shue. (Attachments: #1 Appendix notice of lien and assignment, #2 Appendix document preservation hold notice).(Troy, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
