Cohane v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
1:2004cv00181 |
March 19, 2004 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Buffalo Office |
H. Kenneth Schroeder |
William M. Skretny |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 167 DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part the MAC Defendants' 142 Objections; DENYING Plaintiff's 148 Objections; MODIFYING the August 8, 2013 139 Report and Recommendation of Judge Schroeder to the extent stated abo ve and otherwise ACCEPTED; GRANTING Defendants' 112 Motions for Summary Judgment (SUNY Docket Nos. 189, 197); DISMISSING the complaints; DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to close this case. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge on 3/23/2014. (MEAL) - CLERK TO FOLLOW UP - |
Filing 137 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-ORDER Consolidating 04-CV-943 into 04-CV-181. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr on 4/18/2013. (KER) |
Filing 110 ORDER denying 102 Motion for Discovery. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr on 9/11/2012. (KER) |
Filing 109 ORDER resolving 93 Motion for Discovery. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr on 3/26/2012. (KER) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cohane v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.