Barrows v. Tri-Financial
Plaintiff: Edward Barrows
Defendant: Tri-Financial
Case Number: 1:2009cv00292
Filed: March 30, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Consumer Credit Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: William M. Skretny
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 6 Motion for Default Judgment and Motion for Damages, Attorney's Fees and Costs. DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to enter Judgment as specified; DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to close this case. Signed by William M. Skretny U.S.D.J. on 10/30/2009. (MEAL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barrows v. Tri-Financial
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward Barrows
Represented By: Adam Theodore Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tri-Financial
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?