Miles et al v. Gilray
| Danielle Moran-Combs, Erin Moran and Kelli Miles |
| Thomas Gilray |
| 1:2012cv00599 |
| June 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Cattaraugus |
| William M. Skretny |
| Housing/Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING Plaintiffs' 42 43 44 Motions for Waiver of ADR Fee. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge U.S.D.C. on 3/25/2013. (CMD)
|
|
Filing
7
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING Plaintiffs' 3 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and 3 Motion for Expedited Hearing; ENJOINING Defendant from instituting eviction proceedings against the plaintiffs in state court; ENJOINING Defendant from having any contact of any kind with Plaintiffs; DIRECTING Plaintiffs to continue to pay Defendant lot rent and any other related fees; DIRECTING Plaintiffs to serve Defendant with their Complaint and motion papers, together with a copy of this Decisi on and Order, by July 3, 2012; DIRECTING counsel for Plaintiffs and Defendant to appear before this Court ( Buffalo Courtroom, 2 Niagara Square, Buffalo, NY 14202) on July 10, 2012, at 10:00 a.m., for a status conference to discuss Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge U.S.D.C. on 6/29/2012. (MEAL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
