Covell v. Chiari & Ilecki, LLP et al
| William Covell, Jr. |
| Chiari & Ilecki, LLP and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 1:2012cv00660 |
| July 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Chautauqua |
| Richard J. Arcara |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE HUGH B. SCOTTORDER re 31 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Chiari & Ilecki, LLP, 35 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Attorneys' Fees filed by Chi ari & Ilecki, LLP, 36 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Chiari & Ilecki, LLP,Defendant's Motion for Protective Order (Docket No. 31) is granted; plaintiff may not depose defendant law firm or its partner.As f or defendant's remaining Motions for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 35) and for Rule 11 sanctions (Docket No. 36), Responses due by 7/30/2013., Replies due by 8/6/2013 and motions (to be heard together) will be deemed submitted, without oral argument, on 8/6/2013 unless review of all moving papers indicates that oral argument is appropriate.So Ordered. Signed by Hon. Hugh B. Scott on 7/11/2013. (DRH)
|
|
Filing
19
DECISIION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; adopting Report and Recommendation re 14 . Case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Scott for further proceedings. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 2/21/2013. (JMB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
