Empire Pipeline, Inc. et al v. Town of Pendleton
| Empire Pipeline, Inc. and National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation |
| Town of Pendleton |
| 1:2017cv00141 |
| February 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Erie |
| H. Kenneth Schroeder |
| William M. Skretny |
| Commercial/ICC Rates/etc. |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 717 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
DECISION AND ORDERIT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Empire Pipeline, Inc., and National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket No. 10) is GRANTED IN PART (granting declaratory judgment), DENIED IN PART (denying injunctive relief).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that judgment be entered declaring that defendant Town of Pendleton's building permit requirements are preempted by the Natural Gas Act and FERC proceedings issued thereunder for Plaintiffs' FERC-approved gas pipeline project.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that a status conference shall be held on Wednesday, August 26, 2020, at 2:15 pm, by Zoom teleconference. Chambers will provide directions for attending this conferenc e.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority (Docket No. 44) is deemed MOOT.SO ORDERED.Signed by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 7/14/2020. (JCM)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
