Fellner v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Western District Fellner v. Commissioner of Social Security

Fellner v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Daniel James Fellner
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	1:2018cv00286
Filed:	February 23, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office:	Buffalo Office
County:	Erie
Presiding Judge:	Frank P. Geraci
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 20, 2022	Filing 26 DECISION AND ORDER -- IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that counsel's Motion for Attorney Fees in the amount of $18,383 under 42 U.S.C. § 406 (b)(1)(A) (Docket No. 23) is GRANTED. FURTHER, that Plaintiff's counsel is directed to refund to Plaintiff the $5,626.06 EAJA award within 14 days after receiving the § 406 (b) award. SO ORDERED. Signed by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 10/20/2022. (JCM)
October 1, 2019	Filing 17 DECISION AND ORDER. IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket No. 11) is GRANTED. FURTHER, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket No. 14) is DENIED. FURTHER, that thi s case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with this decision. FURTHER, that the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. SO ORDERED. Signed by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 10/1/2019. (JCM)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-

Date Filed

Document Text

October 20, 2022

Filing 26 DECISION AND ORDER -- IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that counsel's Motion for Attorney Fees in the amount of $18,383 under 42 U.S.C. § 406 (b)(1)(A) (Docket No. 23) is GRANTED. FURTHER, that Plaintiff's counsel is directed to refund to Plaintiff the $5,626.06 EAJA award within 14 days after receiving the § 406 (b) award. SO ORDERED. Signed by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 10/20/2022. (JCM)

October 1, 2019

Filing 17 DECISION AND ORDER. IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket No. 11) is GRANTED. FURTHER, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket No. 14) is DENIED. FURTHER, that thi s case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with this decision. FURTHER, that the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. SO ORDERED. Signed by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 10/1/2019. (JCM)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fellner v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel James Fellner
Represented By:	Kenneth R. Hiller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	Kathryn Sara Pollack(Designation government attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?