Nash v. Degal, et al
| Reeseie Nash |
| Lindsey Cortes, Thomas Degal, Parole Ofc. Scheuler, Cynthia Mooney, Beth Hart-Bader, Amato, ECCF Deputy Biegaj, Juan Melendez, Peter Priester, Mark Schueler, Biegaj, Mr. Hall, Andrew Amato and Jose Melendez |
| 1:2019cv00284 |
| March 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Richard J Arcara |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Letter to update address from Reeseie Nash, dated 4/9/2019, to Court Clerk. (KM) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Andrew Amato, Biegaj, Lindsey Cortes, Thomas Degal, Hall, Beth Hart-Bader, Jose Melendez, Cynthia Mooney, Peter Priester, Mark Schueler, filed by Reeseie Nash. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(KM) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Reeseie Nash.(KM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amato, Lindsey Cortes, Thomas Degal, ECCF Deputy Biegaj, Beth Hart-Bader, Juan Melendez, Cynthia Mooney, Parole Ofc. Scheuler, Peter Priester, filed by Reeseie Nash.(KM) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/6/2019: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (KM). |
| Remark - Plaintiff mailed a Pro Se packet including Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge. (KM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
