Murray v. Hawley et al
Steven Murray |
P. Sutter, Karen Bielak and V. Hawley |
1:2019cv00802 |
June 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Lawrence J Vilardo |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 JUDGMENT administratively terminating this action. Signed by Mary C. Loewenguth, Clerk of Court on 8/7/2019. (KLH) |
Filing 3 ORDER that plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice and that the Clerk of Court shall administratively terminate this case without filing the Complaint or assessing a filing fee; that if Plaintiff wishes to reopen this action, he shall so notify the Court, in writing, no later than thirty days from the date of this Order to include either a motion to proceed in forma pauperis that includes a completed and signed Prison Certification or the $400 total fee. Signed by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 8/7/2019. Copy mailed to Plaintiff.(KLH) |
Remark: Plaintiff has been mailed a copy of #4 Judgment and a blank form motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (KLH) |
Remark: Plaintiff has been mailed a pro se packet including Privacy Notice and Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge. (KLH) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Steven Murray.(KLH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Karen Bielak, V. Hawley, P. Sutter, filed by Steven Murray.(KLH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.