Lee v. Barr et al
Thomas Lee |
Jeffrey Searls, Thomas Feeley and William P. Barr |
1:2019cv00961 |
July 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Lawrence J Vilardo |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by William P. Barr, Thomas Feeley, Jeffrey Searls. (Moar, Daniel) |
Filing 4 Answer and Return RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by William P. Barr, Thomas Feeley, Jeffrey Searls. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3)(Moar, Daniel) |
Filing 3 ORDER that within 45 days of the service of this order, Respondents shall file and serve an answer and memorandum of law or a motion to dismiss the Petition; Petitioner shall have 25 days upon receipt of the answer to file a written response ; the Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of the Petition together with this Order as directed. Signed by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 7/24/2019. (Attachments: #1 copy of petition) Copy mailed to Petitioner.(KLH) |
Filing 2 Pro Se Packet mailed to Petitioner which included: Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, Civil Case Timeline. (KM) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Thomas Lee. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(KM) |
Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number BUF065186. (KM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.