Schlager et al v. 940659 Ontario, Inc. et al
| Karen A. Schlager, David Turkovich and Nigel J. Houenstein |
| 940659 Ontario, Inc. and Jose H. Fernandes |
| 1:2020cv00226 |
| February 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Hugh B Scott |
| William M Skretny |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by 940659 Ontario, Inc., 940659 Ontario, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent TFI International, Inc. for 940659 Ontario, Inc... (Martin, Kathleen) |
| E-Filing Notification regarding 5 RULE 26 DISCLOSURE and #6 CONTINUATION OF EXHIBITS to 5 Rule 26 Disclosure: Per Local Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f), discovery materials should not be filed on the docket. (LB) |
| Filing 6 CONTINUATION OF EXHIBITS to 5 Rule 26 Disclosure, . (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Ciocca, Stephen) |
Filing 4
ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE HUGH B. SCOTTTEXT ORDEROn or before 4/8/2020, the parties will file a joint report addressing the issues to be covered pursuant to Rules 16(c) and 26(f) of the Fed. R. Civ. P. and this Courts Local Civil Rule 16(b); any issue therein not applicable to this case should be indicated as such. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/8/2020. The parties will meet and confer in good faith to accomplish this goal.The parties are further directed to begin Rule 26 initial disclosures immediately.This Court will issue a Scheduling Order after receiving the joint report or will set a Scheduling Conference.Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the parties at any time may consent to have the Magistrate Judge adjudicate individual dispositive proceedings or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or non-jury trial and entry of final judgment (see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 73). The parties are encouraged to consider the potential benefits of a Rule 73 consent, including earlier motion resolution and trial scheduling; however, there will be no adverse consequences at all should the parties decline.So Ordered. Signed by Hon. Hugh B. Scott on 3/2/2020. (DRH)
|
| Filing 3 TEXT REFERRAL ORDER. Hon. Hugh B. Scott, United States Magistrate Judge, is hereby designated to act in this case as follows: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), all pre-trial matters in this case are referred to the above-named United States Magistrate Judge, including but not limited to: (1) conduct of a scheduling conference and entry of a scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, (2) hearing and disposition of all non-dispositive motions or applications, (3) supervision of discovery, and (4) supervision of all procedural matters involving the aforementioned or involving the preparation of the case or any matter therein for consideration by the District Judge. The Magistrate Judge shall not hear and report upon dispositive motions for the consideration of the District Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), unless further ordered by this Court. All motions or applications shall be filed with the Clerk and made returnable before the Magistrate Judge. The parties are encouraged to consider the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(c) governing consent to either partial or complete disposition of the case, including trial if necessary, by the Magistrate Judge. Consent forms are available from the office of the Magistrate Judge or the office of the Clerk of Court. SO ORDERED. Issued by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 2/27/2020. (JCM) |
| ADR Plan electronically forwarded to attorneys. The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(TF) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by 940659 Ontario, Inc., 940659 Ontario, Inc., Jose H. Fernandes. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Martin, Kathleen) |
| Case assigned to Hon. William M. Skretny. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (CGJ) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(CGJ) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (CGJ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from New York State Supreme Court, County of Erie, case number 800618/2020. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0209-3744806), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Martin, Kathleen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
