Ryan v. Commissioner of Social Security
1:2020cv00685 |
June 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Buffalo Office |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff's motion to vacate the ALJ's decision and remand the matter 9 is granted, and the Commissioner's cross motion for judgment on the pleadings 12 is denied. This matter is remanded for further proceedings, for the limited purpose of reassessing the existence and impact of plaintiff's exertional, postural and environmental limitations, beginning with a Step 2 redetermination of whether any of plaintiff's physical diagnoses and conditions (inc luding but not limited to scoliosis and asthma) are severe impairments, and a reassessment of plaintiff's RFC, to include analysis of whether and to what extent plaintiff's severe and non-severe physical diagnoses and conditions impose limitations on her ability to perform work-related functions. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 6/3/2021. (KAH)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ryan v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.