Woo v. Dhatt Transfreight Service, Inc. et al
| Jihyun Woo |
| Sukhjinder Mathon and Dhatt Transfreight Service, Inc. |
| 1:2024cv00944 |
| October 2, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York |
| H Kenneth Schroeder |
| Lawrence J Vilardo |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER regarding issuance of Case Management Order. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder Jr. on 11/25/24. (Attachments: #1 Case Management Order Form, #2 Consent Memorandum, #3 Consent Form)(LMG)
|
| Filing 6 TEXT REFERRAL ORDER - Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder Jr., United States Magistrate Judge, is hereby designated to act in this case as follows: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), all pre-trial matters in this case are referred to the above-named United States Magistrate Judge, including but not limited to: (1) conduct of a scheduling conference and entry of a scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, (2) hearing and disposition of all non-dispositive motions or applications, (3) supervision of discovery, and (4) supervision of all procedural matters involving the aforementioned or involving the preparation of the case or any matter therein for consideration by the District Judge. The Magistrate Judge shall not hear and report upon dispositive motions for the consideration of the District Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), unless further ordered by this Court. All motions or applications shall be filed with the Clerk and made returnable before the Magistrate Judge. The parties are encouraged to consider the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(c) governing consent to either partial or complete disposition of the case, including trial if necessary, by the Magistrate Judge. Consent forms are available from the office of the Magistrate Judge or the office of the Clerk of the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 11/25/2024.(ZHM) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Dhatt Transfreight Service, Inc., Sukhjinder Mathon. (Brodie, James) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Dhatt Transfreight Service, Inc., Sukhjinder Mathon. (Brodie, James) |
| ATTENTION ALL PARTIES OR INTERVENORS: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and/or General Order No. 157 In the Matter of Disclosure of Members, Shareholders, Partners, and Leaders of Business Organization Parties, all Disclosure Statements are to be filed with first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. (KM) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Pursuant to Section 2.1(A) of the Plan for Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (the ADR Plan), this case is automatically referred to ADR. To access the ADR Plan and for inquiries regarding the Court's ADR Program please review the Court's #ADR webpage and/or contact the Court's ADR Administrator at #adrprogram@nywd.uscourts.gov. Prior to the Local Rule 16 scheduling conference, counsel and unrepresented parties shall review the #ADR Plan and confer with each other regarding ADR for this case. Unless the parties agree to a different intervention, it is presumed they will participate in mediation. The parties shall be prepared to report on the outcome of their ADR discussion at the scheduling conference, as the initial Scheduling Order for this case will establish ADR deadlines in accordance with the ADR Plan. (TMK) |
| Case Assigned to Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK) |
| Filing 3 CONTINUATION OF EXHIBITS by Dhatt Transfreight Service, Inc., Sukhjinder Mathon. to #1 Notice of Removal, Document List in State Court Action filed by Dhatt Transfreight Service, Inc., Sukhjinder Mathon. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Document List in State Court Action)(Brodie, James) |
| Filing 2 CONTINUATION OF EXHIBITS by Dhatt Transfreight Service, Inc., Sukhjinder Mathon. to #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Dhatt Transfreight Service, Inc., Sukhjinder Mathon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brodie, James) |
| E-Filing Notification: re #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL - Action Required: Attorney is directed to e-file an Index identifying each document filed and/or served in the state court action pursuant to local rule 81(A) using the Continuation of Exhibits event found under Responses and Replies (TMK) |
| E-Filing Notification: re #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL - Attorney is directed to file a civil cover sheet, pursuant to Local Rule 3. No judge assignment will be made until filing is entered on the docket. Please utilize the Continuation of Exhibits event, located within the Responses and Replies category. (TMK) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants Dhatt Transfreight Service, Inc. and Sukhjinder Mathon from Erie County Supreme, case number 812138/2024. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANYWDC-5296520), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Brodie, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
