Smith v. Spitzer et al
Andre Smith |
Eliot Spitzer, Commissioner Brian Fischer, Fredrick Lamy, Frances Sullivan, Daniel Stewart, David Napoli, R. McCracken and J. Esgrow |
6:2008cv06029 |
May 13, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Chemung |
Charles J. Siragusa |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 DECISION AND ORDER denying 21 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs First and Fifth claims are dismissed, and Defendants motion for summary judgment and, in the alternative, leave to amend the answer, is denied. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 8/15/12. (KAP) |
Filing 14 DECISION AND ORDER re 11 MOTION for Default Judgment will be addressed through an inquest that will be arranged in a separate Order. Time for service is extended an additional 120 days from the date of entry of this Order. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of the Complaint and Order to the Assistant Attorney General. Response is due by 4/30/09. The Clerk is directed to cause US Marshal to serve copies of Summons, Complaint and Order upon New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, former- Governor Spitzer, Commissioner Fischer, Superintendent Napoli, Corrections Officer McCracken and Hearing Officer Esgrow. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1997e (g)(2), the defendants are directed to answer the complaint. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 2/5/09. (RE) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.