Crawford v. Hughes et al
Petitioner: Thomas L. Crawford
Respondent: Hughes, Christopher Wegner, M. Bradt, K. Sault, Cheney and J. Roberts
Case Number: 6:2013cv06638
Filed: December 2, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Rochester Office
County: Chemung
Presiding Judge: Frank P. Geraci
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 153 DECISION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated, Plaintiff's motion for a new trial, ECF Nos. 149 , 152 , is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 11/26/18. A copy of this notice of electronic filing and decision and order have been mailed to the pro se Plaintiff. (JO)
August 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 134 DECISION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated, Thomas's 132 Motions to Stay Trial and Appoint Counsel are DENIED. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 8/2/18. A copy of this NEF and Decision and Order have been mailed to the pro se Plaintiff. (JO)
June 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 124 DECISION AND ORDER granting 105 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs claims against Sergeant Cheney, Officer Roberts, Deputy Superintendent Hughes, and Nurse Sault are dismissed, and the Clerk of the Court is instructed to remove the listed in dividuals as defendants in this case. Plaintiffs objections to Judge Feldmans non-dispositive orders (Docket Nos. 107, 122, 123) are denied. Plaintiffs excessive use of force claim against Officer Wegner remains pending and appears to be trial ready . This matter shall be transferred to the Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Chief United States District Judge, for all further proceedings. (Copy of this Decision and Order sent by first class mail to Plaintiff.). Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 6/22/2018. (JMC)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
March 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDER denying 79 Motion to Compel; denying 85 Motion to Sever; granting in part and denying in part 91 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 104 Motion to Compel. A copy of this order and NEF have been mailed to pro se plaintiff. Signed by Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman on 3/20/2018. (BJJ)
August 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER denying 80 Motion; denying 94 Motion. A copy of this order and NEF have been mailed to pro se plaintiff. (BJJ)
January 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 68 DECISION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's motions for reconsideration, 47 , for injunctive relief, 48 , 53 , 65 , 66 , and to appoint counsel, 58 , are DENIED. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 01/13/2017. A copy of this Decision and Order and NEF have been sent to Thomas Crawford at GREAT MEADOW CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Box 51, Comstock, NY 12821-0051. (ZS)
March 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 45 DECISION AND ORDER: The motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Bradt 25 is GRANTED, the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Hughes, Roberts and Sault 31 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the motions for temporary restraining orders filed by Plaintiff 38 43 are DENIED. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 03/30/2016. A copy of this decision and order has been sent to pro se plaintiff Thomas Crawford at Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Box 51, Comstock, NY 12821-0051 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- (ZS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crawford v. Hughes et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Thomas L. Crawford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Hughes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Christopher Wegner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: M. Bradt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: K. Sault
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Cheney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: J. Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?