Fox v. Zuckenberg

Fox v. Zuckenberg

Plaintiff:	Christopher J. Fox
Defendant:	Mark Zuckenberg
Case Number:	6:2015cv06602
Filed:	October 7, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office:	Rochester Office
County:	Genesee
Presiding Judge:	Frank P. Geraci
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 28, 2016	Filing 8 DECISION AND ORDER: Because Plaintiff has failed to file with this Court the written consent of the United States Attorney General or her designee for Plaintiff to reapply for admission into the United States, the Court concludes that Plaintiff cann ot appear at any potential trial of this matter, and this case is therefore dismissed for Plaintiff's inability to prosecute this action. The Court further certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), that any appeal from this Order would no t be taken in good faith and leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals as a poor person is denied. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). Any request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal should be directed by motion to the Un ited States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in accordance with Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and terminate this action. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 12/28/16. A copy of this Decision and Order and NEF are being mailed to the pro se Plaintiff.(SCE)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
September 1, 2016	Filing 7 DECISION AND ORDER DENYING 3 and 5 , Plaintiff's Motions to Appoint Counsel. Further, Plaintiff is ORDERED to file with the Court a copy of the written consent of the United States Attorney General, or her designee, for Plaintiff to reapply f or admission into the United States. If a copy of such written consent has not been filed on or before November 30, 2016, these actions will be dismissed for Plaintiffs inability to prosecute these cases. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 9/1/16. A copy of this NEF and Decision and Order have been mailed to the pro se Plaintiff. (SCE)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 28, 2016

Filing 8 DECISION AND ORDER: Because Plaintiff has failed to file with this Court the written consent of the United States Attorney General or her designee for Plaintiff to reapply for admission into the United States, the Court concludes that Plaintiff cann ot appear at any potential trial of this matter, and this case is therefore dismissed for Plaintiff's inability to prosecute this action. The Court further certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), that any appeal from this Order would no t be taken in good faith and leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals as a poor person is denied. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). Any request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal should be directed by motion to the Un ited States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in accordance with Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and terminate this action. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 12/28/16. A copy of this Decision and Order and NEF are being mailed to the pro se Plaintiff.(SCE)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-

September 1, 2016

Filing 7 DECISION AND ORDER DENYING 3 and 5 , Plaintiff's Motions to Appoint Counsel. Further, Plaintiff is ORDERED to file with the Court a copy of the written consent of the United States Attorney General, or her designee, for Plaintiff to reapply f or admission into the United States. If a copy of such written consent has not been filed on or before November 30, 2016, these actions will be dismissed for Plaintiffs inability to prosecute these cases. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 9/1/16. A copy of this NEF and Decision and Order have been mailed to the pro se Plaintiff. (SCE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fox v. Zuckenberg
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher J. Fox
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Zuckenberg
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?