Miller v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Western District Miller v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.

Miller v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Timothy L. Miller
Defendant:	Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Case Number:	6:2017cv06081
Filed:	February 6, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office:	Rochester Office
County:	Monroe
Presiding Judge:	Elizabeth A. Wolford
Nature of Suit:	Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 30, 2017	Filing 18 DECISION AND ORDER granting 5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Defendant's motion, ECF No. 5, is granted, and this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Court hereby certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), that any a ppeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals as a poor person is denied. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). Further requests to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis should be directed on motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in accordance with Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate this action.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 10/30/17. Copy of this decision and order and NEF mailed to pro se plaintiff at 500 South Ave., Apt 8A, Rochester, NY 14620 (KAP)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-

Date Filed

Document Text

October 30, 2017

Filing 18 DECISION AND ORDER granting 5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Defendant's motion, ECF No. 5, is granted, and this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Court hereby certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), that any a ppeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals as a poor person is denied. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). Further requests to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis should be directed on motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in accordance with Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate this action.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 10/30/17. Copy of this decision and order and NEF mailed to pro se plaintiff at 500 South Ave., Apt 8A, Rochester, NY 14620 (KAP)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy L. Miller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Represented By:	David Edward Strand
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?