Guess v. Jahromi et al
Regina V. Guess |
Babak Jahromi, Susan A. Moody and Cynthia A. Zink |
6:2017cv06121 |
February 24, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Rochester Office |
Monroe |
Michael A. Telesca |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER finding as moot 8 Motion to Amend or Correct; finding as moot 8 Motion for Hearing; finding as moot 8 Motion ; finding as moot 9 Motion ; finding as moot 9 Motion to Stay. For the same reasons as stated in Guess III, 2016 WL 6695 875, at *1-2, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Decision and Order would not be taken in good faith. This case is to remain closed. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to refuse to accept any fut ure filings by plaintiff in the cases of Guess I, No. 6:11-CV-06473, Guess II, No. 6:16-CV-06637, and Guess III, No. 6:17-CV-06121, without first obtaining approval from this Court.. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 4/26/17. (JMC)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- |
Filing 4 DECISION AND ORDER finding as moot 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; plaintiffs complaint (doc. 1) is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. (Clerk to close case.) Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 3/21/17. (copy of Decision and Order sent by first class mail to Regina Guess.) (JMC)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.