Collins et al v. Colgate-Palmolive Company et al
| Connie T. Collins and Kent Collins |
| Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Colgate-Palmolive Company and Kolmar Laboratories, Inc. |
| 6:2021cv06378 |
| May 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Marian W Payson |
| Elizabeth A Wolford |
| P.I. : Asbestos |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Support re #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Connie T. Collins, Kent Collins. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Seth A. Dymond in further support of Motion to Remand to State Court, #2 Exhibit P - continued Mittenthal dep. excerpt, #3 Exhibit Q - Yakupcin dep. expanded excerpt, #4 Certificate of Service)(Dymond, Seth) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Thomas P. Kurland, #2 Exhibit A, Plaintiffs responses to Defendants interrogatories and document requests, #3 Exhibit B, July 8, 1980 Memorandum, #4 Exhibit C, Process Specification (JNJ000298169), #5 Exhibit D, Deposition excerpts of R. Edmonds, on November 16-17, 2020, #6 Exhibit E, Deposition excerpts of B. Leek, on October 6, 2020, #7 Exhibit F, Deposition excerpts of E. Kausmeyer, on October 21, 2020, #8 Exhibit G, Deposition excerpts of R. Yakupcin on January 23-24, 2020, #9 Exhibit H, Deposition excerpts of J. Mittenthal, on August 14, 2020, #10 Exhibit I, Windsor Minerals, Inc., Consolidated Income Statement, #11 Exhibit J, Process Specification (JNJ000298185), #12 Exhibit K, Report of CTFA Talc Subcommittee, #13 Exhibit L, November 2,1981 Memorandum, #14 Exhibit M, October 14,1982 Memorandum, #15 Exhibit N, Deposition excerpts of P. Locatell, on July 7, 2020, #16 Exhibit O, April 13, 2021 conference agenda, #17 Exhibit P, Complaint dated, April 13, 2021, #18 Exhibit Q, April 13, 2021, Order to Show Cause)(Kurland, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 TEXT ORDER re #9 Motion to Remand to State Court. Responses are due on or before June 30, 2021. Replies are due on or before July 7, 2021. Upon review of the papers, the Court will determine if oral argument is necessary and, if so, will inform the parties of the date and time. Otherwise, the matter will be deemed submitted and decided on the papers. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 06/09/2021. (MGB) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Connie T. Collins, Kent Collins. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Declaration of Seth A Dymond in Support of Remand, #4 Exhibit A - Proof of Service on Kolmar, #5 Exhibit B - Yakupcin Dep excerpt, #6 Exhibit C -1966 correspondence, #7 Exhibit D - Summary Report, American Ground Italian Talc, #8 Exhibit E - Kolmar R&D notes, #9 Exhibit F - 1982 Finesse Report, #10 Exhibit G - Locatell Dep excerpts, #11 Exhibit H - Leek Dep excerpts, #12 Exhibit I - Kolmar formula for Avon, #13 Exhibit J - Kolmar Status Report for Giorgio products, #14 Exhibit K - Edmonds Dep excerpt, #15 Exhibit L - Dec 10, 1973 CTFA Report, #16 Exhibit M - Dec. 13, 1973 CTFA Meeting Memo, #17 Exhibit N - 1973 CTFA Meeting Minutes, #18 Exhibit O - 1993 CTFA Memo)(Dymond, Seth) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Seth A. Dymond on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Dymond, Seth) |
| Filing 7 TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Marian W. Payson for all pre-trial matters excluding dispositive motions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 5/24/21. (JHF) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (CGJ) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(CGJ) |
| Case assigned to Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (CGJ) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Notice of Removal and supporting documents served on Attorneys for Plaintiff and Defendant on May 10, 2021, filed by Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Kurland, Thomas) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Kurland, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Johnson & Johnson for Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc... (Kurland, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Johnson & Johnson. (Kurland, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Johnson & Johnson. (Kurland, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. from Supreme Court of the State of New York, Wayne County, case number CV086758. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0209-4242750), filed by Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A (Part 1) - CV086758 State Court Action filings, #3 Exhibit A (Part 2) - CV086758 State Court Action filings (cont.), #4 Exhibit A (Part 3) - CV086758 State Court Action filings (cont.), #5 Exhibit B - Index of filings in State Court Action (CV086758))(Kurland, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
