Strong v. Zucker
Plaintiff: Michael Corrin Strong
Defendant: Howard Zucker, MD
Case Number: 6:2021cv06532
Filed: August 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Presiding Judge: David G Larimer
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER as to #5 STIPULATION. Plaintiff must amend the complaint on or before 10/21/21; Defendant's answer is due by 12/21/2021. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 9/22/21. A copy of the Order was mailed to plaintiff at his address of record. (PR)
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order E-Filing Notification: ***Motions terminated: MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend #1 Complaint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint filed by Howard Zucker, MD. The docket entry was amended to reflect the proper document filed, a #5 STIPULATION. (PR) (PR)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STIPULATION by the parties to Amend the Complaint and to Answer the Amended Complaint by Howard Zucker, MD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Stipulation, #2 Certificate of Service COs)(Crain, Michele) Modified on 9/22/2021 (PR).
September 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Michele Romance Crain on behalf of Howard Zucker, MD (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service COS)(Crain, Michele)
August 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for permission for file documents electronically by Michael Corrin Strong.(TF)
August 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Service for summons and complaint served on Howard Zucker on certified mail on 8/12/2021, filed by Michael Corrin Strong. (TF)
August 11, 2021 Opinion or Order AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(TF)
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Howard Zucker, MD, filed by Michael Corrin Strong. Filing Fee Paid: ROC013043, $402.00.(TF)
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. Pro Se packet consisting of Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, Civil Case Timeline, ADR Notification and pro se assistance program info given to plaintiff at the counter. (TF)
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Summons Issued as to Howard Zucker, MD. (TF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Strong v. Zucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Corrin Strong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Howard Zucker, MD
Represented By: Michele Romance Crain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?