Pegasys Automation, LLC v. Precision Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Pegasys Automation, LLC doing business as Trask Security Solutions |
Precision Electrical Contractors, Inc. |
6:2023cv06178 |
March 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Elizabeth A Wolford |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CASE. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 5/2/2023. (LMD) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Pegasys Automation, LLC (Hoffman, Elizabeth) |
Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Jeffrey Markovich for Precision Electrical Contractors, Inc. on April 6, 2023, filed by Pegasys Automation, LLC. (Hoffman, Elizabeth) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Pegasys Automation, LLC. (Hoffman, Elizabeth) |
ATTENTION CORPORATION PLAINTIFFS OR INTERVENORS: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.7.1 and/or General Order No. 157. In the Matter of Disclosure of Members, Shareholders, Partners, and Leaders of Business Organization Parties, all Corporate Disclosure Statements are to be filed within seven (7) days of this notice. (KM) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Precision Electrical Contractors, Inc. (LMD) |
Filing 3 Original Summons Filed. (Hoffman, Elizabeth) |
Original Summons Not Submitted. (TMK) |
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(TMK) |
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK) |
Case Assigned to Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by Pegasys Automation, LLC d/b/a Trask Security Solutions re #1 Complaint (Rule 7.1 Statement) (Hoffman, Elizabeth) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Pegasys Automation, LLC d/b/a Trask Security Solutions. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hoffman, Elizabeth) |
Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number ANYWDC-4831724. (LB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pegasys Automation, LLC v. Precision Electrical Contractors, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Pegasys Automation, LLC doing business as Trask Security Solutions | |
Represented By: | Elizabeth A. Hoffman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Precision Electrical Contractors, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.