Laing v. Smith et al
| Sharon Laing |
| County of Monroe, David M. Smith, Hon. Judge Vincent Dinolfo, RPD Officer Zenelovic, Rochester City Impound, Mario Correia, Theresa Dearcop, Rochester Police Department and Sandra Doorley |
| 6:2024cv06545 |
| September 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Elizabeth A Wolford |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sharon Laing. (JHF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mario Correia, County of Monroe, Theresa Dearcop, Vincent Dinolfo, Sandra Doorley, Rochester City Impound, Rochester Police Department, David M. Smith, Zenelovic, filed by Sharon Laing. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (JHF) |
| Pro Se Packet consisting of Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, Pro Se Assistance Program, Civil Case Timeline and ADR Notification given to plaintiff. (JHF) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (JHF) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO MEDIATION: Pursuant to Section 2.1(A) of the Plan for Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (the ADR Plan), this case is automatically referred to ADR. To access the ADR Plan and for inquiries regarding the Court's ADR Program please review the Court's #ADR webpage and/or contact the Court's ADR Administrator at #adrprogram@nywd.uscourts.gov. Prior to the Local Rule 16 scheduling conference, counsel and unrepresented parties shall review the #ADR Plan and confer with each other regarding ADR for this case. Unless the parties agree to a different intervention, it is presumed they will participate in mediation. The parties shall be prepared to report on the outcome of their ADR discussion at the scheduling conference, as the initial Scheduling Order for this case will establish ADR deadlines in accordance with the ADR Plan. (JHF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
