Carter v. Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Medical Department et al
| Jerome J. Carter |
| Denise Ryan and Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Medical Department |
| 1:2013fp00275 |
| June 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| Joseph N. Laplante |
| Landya B. McCafferty |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
///ORDER approving 6 Report and Recommendation, recommending that the retaliation claim against Ryan and all of the claims against the HCDC Medical Department be dismissed from this action. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(cmp)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER Directing Clerks Office to forward Service documents to US Marshal to Make Service. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(cmp)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER granting 2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis as to Jerome J. Carter, initial fee of $-0-. Given the plaintiffs current balance there shall be no initial filing fee assessed. In addition, monthly payments of 20 % of each preceding months income credited to the plaintiffs account shall be remitted by the Institution when the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.Finance Follow Up Deadline 8/26/2013(jeb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
