Petty et al v. Marvin Lumber and Cedar Company t/a Marvin Windows and Doors
| Troy D. Petty and Annah A. Petty |
| Marvin Lumber and Cedar Company t/a Marvin Windows and Doors |
| 2:2013cv00062 |
| October 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Northern Division Office |
| DARE |
| James C. Fox |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that pursuant to the court's order dated 9/4/2014, Marvin's Motion to Dismiss is ALLOWED and, Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is ALLOWED, and Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 9/11/2015. (Edwards, S.)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting 10 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint within 21 days of the filing date of this order. If Plaintiffs do not file an amended complaint within that t ime period, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the case without further order from the court. If Plaintiffs do, however, file an amended complaint, Marvin may file an answer or responsive motion within time period allowed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Civil Rules of this court. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 9/4/2014. (Grady, B.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
