Gates v. Waffle House Corporation et al
| Deanna L. Gates |
| Cheryl Allen, James Dean, Eve Stubbs, Waffle House Corporation and Angelo Martinez |
| 2:2018cv00041 |
| August 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Northern Division Office |
| HALIFAX |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Order Redesignating Division to Eastern Division. This case is redesignated as an Eastern Division case. The Honorable Terrence W. Boyle, United States District Judge, will remain the presiding judge. All future documents shall reflect the new case number of 4:18-CV-140-BO. No further filing shall be made in 2:18-CV-41-BO. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 8/14/2018. Copy sent to Deanna L. Gates via US Mail to 54 Perennial Ln., Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870. (Stouch, L.)
|
| Intradistrict Transfer to Eastern Division. New case number: 4:18-cv-140-BO. (Stouch, L.) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Deanna L. Gates. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Deanna L. Gates. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Deanna L. Gates. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Exhibit Notice of Suit Rights, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to party: This case should have been filed in the Eastern division. The Clerk will enter a reassignment order correcting the error. (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
