Webb v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Seanise N. Webb
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Interested Party: SSA-Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 2:2024cv00055
Filed: November 20, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Richard E Myers
Referring Judge: Robert T Numbers
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2025 Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES Regarding Briefing Under Supplemental Rules and Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (McNally, Kimberly)
January 16, 2025 Filing 8 Transcripts - Social Security Case (Zeiler, Samantha)
January 16, 2025 Filing 7 Transcripts - Social Security Case (Zeiler, Samantha)
January 16, 2025 Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by Samantha Zeiler on behalf of Carolyn Colvin. (Zeiler, Samantha)
November 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 11/20/2024. (Copy of order mailed to Plaintiff.) (McNally, Kimberly)
November 20, 2024 NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASE SERVICE - This action is governed by the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Pursuant to Supplemental Rule 3, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate office within the Social Security of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of this case and Plaintiff's complaint. No summons will issue. Defendant's deadline to serve an answer or motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 is governed by Supplemental Rule 4. (McNally, Kimberly)
November 19, 2024 Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II regarding #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (McNally, Kimberly)
November 13, 2024 Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Seanise N. Webb. (Rudd, D.)
November 13, 2024 Filing 3 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Seanise N. Webb. (Rudd, D.)
November 13, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Seanise N. Webb. (Rudd, D.)
November 13, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin O'Malley, filed by Seanise N. Webb. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Exhibit 2- Notice of Decision - Unfavorable, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons) (Rudd, D.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Webb v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Seanise N. Webb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA-Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Represented By: Samantha Zeiler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?