Oliver v. Stox
Appellee:
Mary Cox Stox
Appellant:
George Mason Oliver
Case Number:
4:2011cv00130
Filed:
August 5, 2011
Court:
North Carolina Eastern District Court
Office:
Eastern Division Office
County:
CRAVEN
Presiding Judge:
Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit:
Appeal
Cause of Action:
28:0158
Jury Demanded By:
None
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| October 3, 2011 | 9 |
ORDER granting 8 Motion to Dismiss - Signed by Chief Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 09/30/2011. (Baker, C.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Oliver v. Stox | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: Mary Cox Stox | |
| Represented By: | Edwin M. Hardy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellant: George Mason Oliver | |
| Represented By: | George Mason Oliver |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.