Krahenbuhl v. Hyde County Schools
Judy A. Krahenbuhl |
Hyde County Schools |
4:2012cv00170 |
August 8, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Eastern Division Office |
DARE |
Terrence W. Boyle |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the defendants motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART and this matter is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY. The clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Susan Edwards, Deputy for Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 3/20/2013. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Edwards, S.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Krahenbuhl v. Hyde County Schools | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Judy A. Krahenbuhl | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Hyde County Schools | |
Represented By: | Curtis H. Allen, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.