Barnes v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Tamela P. Barnes
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 4:2012cv00254
Filed: October 30, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Eastern Division Office
County: HALIFAX
Presiding Judge: James C. Dever
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court GRANTS the Commissioner's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [D.E. 29], DENIES Plaintiff's Motion [D.E. 25], and AFFIRMS the Commissioner's final decision. Signed by Debby Sawyer, Deputy Clerk for Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 1/13/2014. (Sawyer, D.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barnes v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tamela P. Barnes
Represented By: Lawrence Wittenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?