UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Nunn

Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: Michael K. Nunn
Case Number: 4:2013cv00160
Filed: June 27, 2013
Court: North Carolina Eastern District Court
Office: Eastern Division Office
County: PITT
Presiding Judge: W. Earl Britt
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other
Cause of Action: 31:3729 False Claims Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 30, 2013 6 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT against Michael K. Nunn. Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 7/30/2013. (Marsh, K)
July 12, 2013 5 Opinion or Order of the Court CONSENT JUDGMENT against Michael K. Nunn in the amount of $594,430.00 plus interest at 5% per annum and future costs. Signed by Senior Judge W. Earl Britt on 7/12/2013. (Marsh, K)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Nunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Neal Fowler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael K. Nunn
Represented By: John Keating Wiles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?