Howard v. Colvin

Howard v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Clifton R. Howard
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	4:2016cv00228
Filed:	August 18, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office:	Eastern Division Office
County:	LENOIR
Presiding Judge:	James C. Dever
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 205
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 11, 2018	Filing 29 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court hereby awards Plaintiff $3,069.90 in attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (28 U.S.C. § 2412(c) and (d)), paid to Plaintiffs attorney if there is no debt that qualifies under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716). If there is such a debt; any fee remaining after offset will be payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiff's attorney. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 1/11/2018. (Briggeman, N.)
September 11, 2017	Filing 24 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the court adopts the conclusions in the M&R [D.E. 22]. Plaintiffs motion for judgment on the pleadings [D.E. 17] is GRANTED, defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings [D.E. 19] is DENIED, and the action is REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S. C. § 405(g). Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 9/11/2017. (Briggeman, N.)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 11, 2018

Filing 29 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court hereby awards Plaintiff $3,069.90 in attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (28 U.S.C. § 2412(c) and (d)), paid to Plaintiffs attorney if there is no debt that qualifies under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716). If there is such a debt; any fee remaining after offset will be payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiff's attorney. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 1/11/2018. (Briggeman, N.)

September 11, 2017

Filing 24 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the court adopts the conclusions in the M&R [D.E. 22]. Plaintiffs motion for judgment on the pleadings [D.E. 17] is GRANTED, defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings [D.E. 19] is DENIED, and the action is REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S. C. § 405(g). Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 9/11/2017. (Briggeman, N.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Howard v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clifton R. Howard
Represented By:	Derrick Kyle Arrowood
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?