Keith v. Berryhill

Keith v. Berryhill

Plaintiff:	Tammy Williams Keith
Defendant:	Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number:	4:2017cv00081
Filed:	June 20, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office:	Eastern Division Office
County:	CRAVEN
Presiding Judge:	James C. Dever
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 205
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 10, 2018	Filing 35 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant pay to Plaintiff $3,900.00 in attorney's fees, in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. I f the award to Plaintiff is not subject to the Treasury Offset Program, payment will be made by check payable to Plaintiff's counsel, Derrick Arrowood and mailed to his office at P.O. Box 10629, Raleigh, NC 27605 in accordance with Plaintiff's assignment to her attorney of her right to payment of attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 8/10/2018. (Sellers, N.)
May 9, 2018	Filing 30 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the court adopts the conclusions in the M&R [D.E. 28]. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings [D.E. 22] is GRANTED, defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings [D.E. 25] is DENIED, and the action is REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 5/9/2018. (Briggeman, N.)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 10, 2018

Filing 35 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant pay to Plaintiff $3,900.00 in attorney's fees, in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. I f the award to Plaintiff is not subject to the Treasury Offset Program, payment will be made by check payable to Plaintiff's counsel, Derrick Arrowood and mailed to his office at P.O. Box 10629, Raleigh, NC 27605 in accordance with Plaintiff's assignment to her attorney of her right to payment of attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 8/10/2018. (Sellers, N.)

May 9, 2018

Filing 30 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the court adopts the conclusions in the M&R [D.E. 28]. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings [D.E. 22] is GRANTED, defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings [D.E. 25] is DENIED, and the action is REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 5/9/2018. (Briggeman, N.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Keith v. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tammy Williams Keith
Represented By:	Derrick Kyle Arrowood
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?