Brown v. Superior Court of Wake County et al
Calvin Earl Brown |
Superior Court of Wake County, R. Allen Baddour and State of North Carolina |
4:2018cv00199 |
December 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 JUDGMENT - In accordance with the court's order entered February 1, 2019, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that this action is dismissed. The plaintiff shall have and recover nothing from this action. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 2/4/2019. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 8 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re #5 Memorandum and Recommendations. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The clerk is DIRECTED to close the case. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 2/1/2019. (A certified copy of this Order was sent via US mail to Calvin Earl Brown, 31 Cherry Lane, Chocowinity, NC 27817.) (Collins, S.) |
Filing 7 OBJECTION to #5 Order and Memorandum and Recommendations by Calvin Earl Brown. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Collins, S.) |
Motion Submitted to District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan regarding #5 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Calvin Earl Brown. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 6 COMPLAINT against R. Allen Baddour, State of North Carolina, Superior Court of Wake County filed by Calvin Earl Brown. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 5 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Calvin Earl Brown. Objections to Memorandum and Recommendations due by 1/31/2019. Signed by United States Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 1/17/2019. Copy of order and 18-SO-5 Notice sent to Calvin Earl Brown, 31 Cherry Lane, Chocowinity, NC 27817 via US Mail. (Edwards, S.) |
Filing 4 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Calvin Earl Brown. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Calvin Earl Brown. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Collins, S.) |
Filing 2 ORDER OF DEFICIENCY - Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr on 12/21/2018. (A copy of this Order and necessary forms was sent via US mail to Calvin Earl Brown, 31 Cherry Lane, Chocowinity, NC 27817.) (Collins, S.) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Calvin Earl Brown. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Exhibit Statement of Facts, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons The State of North Carolina, #5 Proposed Summons The Superior Court of Wake County, #6 Proposed Summons The Honorable R. Allen Baddour, #7 Envelope) (Rudd, D.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Calvin Earl Brown. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.) |
Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Collins, S.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - A party who is proceeding without an attorney shall file a notice of self representation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(b). (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.