First Protective Insurance Company v. Busacco et al
| First Protective Insurance Company |
| Joseph Busacco and Mary Wildes |
| 4:2020cv00089 |
| May 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by Stephen Kyle Pytlik on behalf of First Protective Insurance Company. (Pytlik, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by Jeffrey D. Keister on behalf of First Protective Insurance Company. (Keister, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by First Protective Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent PWC Financial, Inc. for First Protective Insurance Company. (Keister, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 Notice filed by First Protective Insurance Company Proposed Summons to Mary Wildes. (Keister, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 Notice filed by First Protective Insurance Company Proposed Summons to Joseph Busacco. (Keister, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against All Defendants, filed by First Protective Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Insurance Policy, #2 Exhibit B-Demand for Appraisal, #3 Exhibit C-Appraiser Appointment Form, #4 Exhibit D-Appraisal Award, #5 Exhibit E-Award Letter, #6 Exhibit F-Revocation Letter, #7 Civil Cover Sheet) (Keister, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
