United States of America v. $60,000.00 in U.S. Currency
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $60,000.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant: Mohammed Hamood Abiah and Hisham Alghazaly
Case Number: 4:2022cv00024
Filed: March 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Richard E Myers
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 981 Civil Forfeiture
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2022 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #5 Claim. All counsel appearing on behalf of a party should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). See also Local Civil Rule 83.1(e) for non-local counsel. Additionally, without leave of court to file in paper, all documents, motions, pleadings, etc. filed with the court must be filed electronically. Counsel is directed to file a notice or special notice of appearance (to include an appearance by local counsel, as needed) and a motion for leave to file in paper. (Copy of Notice sent to Micah Kwasnik, Esq., 34 Ludlow Dr., Chap. NY 10514 via US Mail.) (Waddell, K.)
April 21, 2022 Filing 5 CLAIM by Mohammed Hamood Abiah, Hisham Alghazaly. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Sellers, N.)
March 14, 2022 Filing 4 WARRANT of Arrest and Notice In Rem issued by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 3/14/2022. (Waddell, K.)
March 14, 2022 Document Referred: #2 Notice Requesting Clerk to Issue Warrant of Arrest referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court. (Waddell, K.)
March 11, 2022 Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Matthew Lee Fesak on behalf of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Fesak, Matthew)
March 11, 2022 Filing 2 Notice Requesting Clerk to Issue Warrant of Arrest filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA . (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Fesak, Matthew)
March 11, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Forfeiture In Rem against $60,000.00 in U.S. Currency, filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Special Agent Jeffrey R. White, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Fesak, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. $60,000.00 in U.S. Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Matthew Lee Fesak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $60,000.00 in U.S. Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Mohammed Hamood Abiah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Hisham Alghazaly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?