Butler v. Kijakazi
| David Butler |
| Act. Comm. SSA Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 4:2022cv00099 |
| August 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Robert B Jones |
| Richard E Myers |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Order Redesignating Division to Western Division. The Honorable Richard E. Myers II, Chief United States District Judge, will remain the presiding judge. All future filings should reflect the new case number of 5:22-CV-329-M. No further filing shall be made in 4:22-CV-99-M. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 8/19/2022. (Waddell, K.)
|
| Filing 6 Financial Disclosure Statement by David Butler (Scurfield, Scott) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number Check#5001.), filed by David Butler. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Fed Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Summons K. Kijakazi, #3 Proposed Summons Summons M. Garland, #4 Proposed Summons Summons Acker, #5 Exhibit USMS Kijakazi, #6 Exhibit USMS Garland, #7 Exhibit USMS Acker) (Scurfield, Scott) |
| Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by David Butler (Scurfield, Scott) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Scott A. Scurfield on behalf of David Butler. (Scurfield, Scott) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, filed by David Butler. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet COVERSHEET, #2 Proposed Summons SUMMONS, #3 Proposed Summons SUMMONS, #4 Proposed Summons SUMMONS, #5 Exhibit USMS KIJAKAZI, #6 Exhibit USMS GARLAND, #7 Exhibit USMS ACKER) (Scurfield, Scott) M (Attachment 1 flattened and replaced on 8/25/2022) (Edwards, S.). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, filed by David Butler. (Scurfield, Scott) |
| Intradistrict Transfer to Western Division. New case number: 5:22-cv-329-M. (Waddell, K.) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #4 Financial Disclosure Statement. Counsel has failed to complete, date and sign the financial disclosure statement. Counsel is directed to complete the form and refile. (Rudd, D.) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #2 Complaint - Payment of the civil filing fee is due upon case initiation or either the filing of a Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. Payments can be, made in the form of cash, checks, or credit cards and paid at the clerk's office during regular business hours. Credit card payments can be made over the telephone to the clerk's office during regular business hours. Also, Pay.gov is an additional credit card option that allows the filer to pay filing fee contemporaneously with the case opening in CM/ECF. (See Section V.D(l)(a) of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Counsel - This case should have been filed in the Western division. The Clerk will enter a reassignment order correcting the error. (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Counsel regarding: [2-1] Civil Cover Sheet. Counsel is reminded that the filing user must lock or flatten the PDF document. Failure to flatten documents may result in the clerks office issuing a notice of deficiency. Counsel should "flatten" (the civil cover sheet) prior to attaching it in accordance with Section IV.B of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. No further action is needed. (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice of Social Security Case Filing. (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
