Davis v. Town of Cary North Carolina et al
| William Scott Davis, Jr. |
| Town of Cary North Carolina, Harold Weinbrecht, State of North Carolina, Wake County Public School System, Mrs. Patti Head, The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Wake County Human Services, Albert Singer, Triangle Family Services and Miles Wright |
| 5:2008cv00176 |
| April 8, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| xxU.S. Outside District |
| Terrence W. Boyle |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
ORDER denying 100 Motion to Reopen Case; denying 101 Motion to Reopen Case; denying 102 Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions. Signed by Chief US District Court Judge Richard E. Myers II on 8/2/2021. (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER - The motions to reopen the case, appeal, and amend the findings of the Court are DENIED. [DE 90, 92, 93].. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 1/21/2021. Copy sent via US Mail to William Scott Davis, Jr., 84944-083, Thomson AUSP, U.S. Penitentiary, PO Box 1002, Thomson, IL 61285. (Stouch, L.)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER denying 87 Motion to Set Aside Judgment; denying 88 Motion to Reopen Case. Signed by Chief Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 10/21/2020. Copy sent via US Mail to William Scott Davis, Jr. at Thomson AUSP U.S. Penitentiary, PO Box 1002, Thomson, IL 61285. (Stouch, L.)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER denying 64 Motion to Reassign Case ; denying 65 Motion Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 59(c) - New Evidence; denying 66 Motion Relief from Judgment ; denying 68 Motion for Additional Findings. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 6/30/2017. Certified copy sent via US Mail to William Scott Davis, Jr. at Butner - F.M.C., P.O. Box 1600, Butner, NC 27509. (Stouch, L.)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER denying 58 Motion Pursuant to F.R.Civ.P 60(b); denying 59 Motion Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 59(c); denying 60 Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 17(c)(2); denying 61 Motion Pursuant to Rule 60(b); denying 62 Motion pursuant to Rules 17 and 60. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 4/9/2017. Certified copy sent via US Mail to William Scott Davis, Jr. at Butner - F.M.C., P.O. Box 1600, Butner, NC 27509. (Stouch, L.)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER denying 47 and 53 Rule 60(b) Motions. The motions to reopen case and for relief under Rule 60(b) in each of the above-captioned cases are DENIED. The Court will consider critically any future filings by Mr. Davis in which it is apparent that he is merely seeking to avoid the pre-filing injunction. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 12/21/2016. Certified copy sent to William Scott Davis via US mail to P.O. Box 1600, Butner, NC 27509. (Stouch, L.)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER denying 39 MOTION to Reopen Case, MOTION to Amend Complaint and MOTION - F.R.C.P. Rule 60, Rule 15, 28 USC 1915. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 6/30/2016. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff via US Mail to P.O. Box 1600, Butner, NC 27509. (Romine, L.)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER denying 25 Motion Rule 60(b)(4) and Rule 15(c)(2). Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 2/29/2016. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff via US Mail to Butner - F.M.C., P.O. Box 1600, Butner, NC 27509. (Romine, L.)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER denying 21 Motion to Set Aside Judgment. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 2/25/2016. Copy sent to pro se plaintiff via US Mail to New Hanover County Jail, 3950 Juvenile Center Rd., Castle Haynes, NC 28429. (Romine, L.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
