Floyd v. Astrue

Floyd v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Gwendolyn Floyd
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	5:2009cv00323
Filed:	July 15, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office:	Western Division Office
County:	VANCE
Presiding Judge:	James C. Dever
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 9, 2010	Filing 31 ORDER: Upon application of the Plaintiff, and with no objection by Defendant, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay the sum of $3,214.38 in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Upon payment of such sum this case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Dever III on 7/9/2010. Copies served. (Sawyer, D.)
June 8, 2010	Filing 26 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the court has reviewed the M&R, the record, and the briefs. The court is satisfied that there is no clear error on the face of the record. Plaintiffs motion for judgment on the pleadings [D.E. 13] is GRANTE D, defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED [D.E. 17], and the action is REMANDED to the Commissioner for proceedings consistent with this order. Signed by Dennis P. Iavarone, Clerk of Court by Debby Sawyer, Deputy on 6/8/2010. Copies served. (Sawyer, D.)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 9, 2010

Filing 31 ORDER: Upon application of the Plaintiff, and with no objection by Defendant, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay the sum of $3,214.38 in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Upon payment of such sum this case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Dever III on 7/9/2010. Copies served. (Sawyer, D.)

June 8, 2010

Filing 26 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the court has reviewed the M&R, the record, and the briefs. The court is satisfied that there is no clear error on the face of the record. Plaintiffs motion for judgment on the pleadings [D.E. 13] is GRANTE D, defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED [D.E. 17], and the action is REMANDED to the Commissioner for proceedings consistent with this order. Signed by Dennis P. Iavarone, Clerk of Court by Debby Sawyer, Deputy on 6/8/2010. Copies served. (Sawyer, D.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Floyd v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gwendolyn Floyd
Represented By:	Vaughn Stephen Clauson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?