Pipefitters Local No. 636 Defined Benefit Plan v. Tekelec et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 22, 2013
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court GRANTS the Motion to Dismiss [D.E. 40], and the Plaintiff's request to file a Third Amended Complaint is DENIED. Signed by Debby Sawyer, Deputy Clerk for Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 3/22/2013. (Sawyer, D.)
|March 26, 2012
ORDER granting 24 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs' amended complaint [D.E. 20] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs may address the errors identified by the court, make any other changes plaintiffs deem appropriate, and file a second ame nded complaint. If plaintiffs choose to file a second amended complaint, plaintiffs must do so on or before April 30, 2012. If plaintiffs file a second amended complaint, defendants shall respond in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3). Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 3/26/2012. (Sawyer, D.)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?