Mabeley v. MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc., et al
||Gregory M. Mabeley
||PCS Sales (USA), Inc., FIBA Technologies, Inc., Richards Industries, Inc., MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc., MEMC Pasadena, Inc. and PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
||June 21, 2012
||US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
||Western Division Office
||Louise Wood Flanagan
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Personal Injury
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 24, 2014
ORDER DISMISSING CASE - The court has been advised that the parties have settled all matters in controversy among them. Therefore, this matter is DISMISSED subject to the right of any party to file a motion to reopen the case should settlement not be consummated within forty-five (45) days hereof. The parties are directed to file their Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice on or before Thursday, April 10, 2014. As there appears to be no further reason at this time to maintain the file as an open one for statistical purposes, this case is removed from the active docket. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 02/24/2014. (Baker, C.)
|July 3, 2013
ORDER granting 36 Motion to Reflect Corporate Name Change and Amend Case Caption - The Court directs the Clerk of Court to amend the case caption and any relevant Court records to change MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.'s name to SunEdison, Inc. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 07/03/2013. (Baker, C.)
|March 19, 2013
AMENDED CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 03/19/2013. (Baker, C.)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?